April 8, 2008

Should Luxury be made accessible to everyone?

Posted in 1 tagged , , at 3.06 am by adaphnee

In tonight’s brand management class, we tried to examine the case of Burberry, going from its history to what it wants to convey today to the public. It appears that Burberry wants to position itself as a traditional, luxury brand, but also one that can be fashionable, trendy and hip. So what is exactly the positioning statement of Burberry? Can it actually be placed in the “luxury” category? Is true luxury actually accessible to everyone? Should we call the Burberry, Coach, Polo, etc. luxury brands?

I think that true luxury should remain unreachable to just anyone. True luxury carries an image of pure tradition, status and high-quality, that should actually only be accessible to those who can afford it. Luxury represents the dream of the upscale milieu, and portrays the lines of beauty, sophistication, elegance and uniqueness. Some brands are swimming between the “low level of high-end” and the “true luxury” circle, and have a hard time defining their core image and value. How should we then call this area? Should we just rename it to something other? I believe so…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: